Volume 2, Issue 6, November 2017, Page: 72-81
Improvement of Lubrication and Cooling in Grinding by Effective Controlling of Air Boundary
Sujit Majumdar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
Suraj Kumar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, India
Debasish Roy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
Samik Chakraborty, Department of Electronics, Indian Maritime University, Kolkata Campus, Kolkata, India
Received: Sep. 5, 2017;       Accepted: Dec. 26, 2017;       Published: Jan. 16, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijimse.20170206.12      View  1465      Downloads  81
Abstract
The presence of air around a rotating grinding wheel impedes the effective entry of coolant into grinding zone. Therefore, a proficient method is required to minimize this air boundary before the impingement of fluid-jet into the grinding zone. This paper is an experimental study for finding the better effective method of controlling the air boundary around the wheel. Further, two different techniques of suppressing the air barrier has been studied experimentally and statistically towards improving the cutting fluid action in grinding. Fuzzy models are developed to interpret the relationship between the variables and responses. Experiments are conducted on a horizontal surface grinding machine with the application of scraper board and pneumatic barrier separately behind the flood cooling nozzle. The surface roughness and other mechanical properties of these two methods and traditional flood cooling method are compared. The experimental results specified that the tangential force and the requirement of specific energy are reduced by maximum 25% and 20% respectively by the scraper board (SB) with the comparison to the pneumatic barrier (PnB) method for achieving the equivalent surface quality when tested by positioning them at 60° location from grinding zone. Hence, use of scraper board at close proximity to grinding zone is recommended.
Keywords
Scraper Board, Pneumatic Barrier, Grinding Forces, Surface Texture, ANOVA, Statistical Analysis
To cite this article
Sujit Majumdar, Suraj Kumar, Debasish Roy, Samik Chakraborty, Improvement of Lubrication and Cooling in Grinding by Effective Controlling of Air Boundary, International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering. Vol. 2, No. 6, 2017, pp. 72-81. doi: 10.11648/j.ijimse.20170206.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Malkin, S. 1990. Grinding technology: Theory and application of machining with abrasives. Chichester: Ellis Harwood.
[2]
Marinescu, I. D., Rowe, W. B., Ohmori. H. and Dimitro. B. 2004. Tribology of Abrasive Machining Processes. William Andrew Publishing.
[3]
Parthasarathy, A. and Malkin, S. 2010. Effect of fluid application conditions on grinding behavior. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 224 (2), 225- 235.
[4]
Da Silva, E. J., Bianchi, E. C., De Oliveira, J. F. G. and De Aguiar, P. R. 2003. Evaluation of grinding fluids in grinding of a martensitic valve steel with CBN and alumina abrasives. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 217 (8), 1047-1055.
[5]
Majumdar, S., Mandal, B., Das, S. and Chakraborty, S. 2016. Experimental investigation and modelling on air layer formation around a rotating grinding wheel. Cogent Engineering. 3. doi:10.1080/23311916.2016.1183273.
[6]
Majumdar, S., Mandal, B., Das, S. and Chakraborty, S. 2015. Modeling air layer pressure around a rotating grinding wheel. Global Journal on Advancement in Engineering and Science. 1, 56–63.
[7]
Mandal, B., Singh, R., Das, S. and Banerjee, S. 2011. Improving grinding performance by controlling air flow around a grinding wheel. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture. 51, 670–676.
[8]
Mandal, B., Singh, R., Das, S. and Banerjee, S. 2012. Development of a Grinding Fluid Delivery Technique and Its Performance Evaluation. Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 27. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2011.585487.
[9]
Guo, C. and Malkin, S. 1992. Analysis of fluid flow through the grinding zone. ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry. 104, 427-434.
[10]
Mandal, B., Majumdar, S., Das, S. and Banerjee, S. (2011). Formation of a significantly less stiff air-layer around a grinding wheel pasted with rexine leather. International Journal of Precision Technology. 2 (1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJPTECH.2011.038106.
[11]
Morgan, M. N., Jackson, A. R., Wu, H., Baines-Jones, V., Batako, A. and Rowe, W. B. 2008. Optimisation of fluid application in grinding. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. 57, 363–366.
[12]
Majumdar, S., Kumar, S., Chakraborty, S. and Roy, D.2017. Effective application of scraper board in grinding. Tribology International. 116, 120–128 (2017) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.07.009.
[13]
Mandal, B., Singh, R., Das, S. and Banerjee, S. 2010. Study of the Behavior of Air Flow around a Grinding Wheel under the Application of Pneumatic Barrier. Proceedings of the 36th International MATADOR Conference. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84996-432-6_26.
[14]
Chockalingam, P. and Kuang, K. C. 2016. Effect of Grinding Process Parameters on Surface Area Roughness of Glass fibre Reinforced Composite Laminate under Dry and Coolant Environment. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 8 (2), 1295 -1301.
[15]
Chockalingam, P., Kok, K. and Vijayaram, R. 2012. Effect of Coolant on Cutting Forces and Surface Roughness in Grinding of CSM GFRP. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation. 6 (8), 1478–1483.
Browse journals by subject